Sorry Python but it is what it is.

  • _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think it’s fair to blame pip for some ancient abandoned packages you tried to use.

    • ExLisper@linux.communityOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issues I had:

      • packages installing but not working due to missing dependencies
      • packages installing but not working due to broken dependencies (wrong lib version installed)
      • packages not building and failing with obscure errors
      • one package was abandoned and using Python 2.7

      If a ‘pip install X’ completes successfully but X doesn’t work it’s on pip. And when it fails it could tell you why. Cargo does.

      • _stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        packages installing but not working due to missing dependencies

        This is the fault of the package author/maintainer

        packages installing but not working due to broken dependencies

        Sometimes the fault of the package author/maintainer. Sometimes this is the fault of a different package you’re also trying to use in tandem. Ultimately this is a problem with the shared library approach python takes and it can be ‘solved’ by vendoring within your own package.

        packages not building and failing with obscure errors

        Assuming the package is good, this is a problem with your build system. It’s like complaining a make file won’t run because your system doesn’t have gcc installed.

        one package was abandoned and using Python 2.7

        Unfortunately there’s a ton of this kind of stuff. I suppose you can blame pypi for this, they should have some kind of warning for essentially abandoned projects.