• kirk781@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whilst I am sure the article might be low quality ultimately, I still wish to see what other options they are advocating. This is clearly just a screenshot and only the first option for blocking ads.

    • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      2. Use a mental block
      Close your eyes for 8s - 25 min, and pretend not to hear anything

      3. What? I can’t hear you!
      Why play one ad when you can play a dozen. Open multiple YouTube tabs at once and let the ads roll at the same time. A few minutes of noise for a whole few minutes of ad-free play

      4. Use AdBlock Premium Plus
      Of course, the best block is not loading the ads. Using the discount code AFFILIATEWHORE you can get a one year Pro plan for AdBlock Premium with six months free for just $169,- per year and enjoy the ad-free experience you deserve.

      ^(/s, of course)

      • kirk781@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The last can’t easily be sarcasm. In app adblockers like Adguard do have a premium subscription option(I had one for a year back in the day, yes, stupid me) and I won’t be surprised if in the future some adblocker comes with such an option(should Raymond Hill stop working on uBlock Origin for whatever reason and the community couldn’t pick the development up that good).

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I unironically use the 3rd option to support creators. I still use adblock if the creator isn’t monetized or it’s content that probably shouldn’t be getting monetized (eg. rips of game OSTs not by the game dev)

    • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the actual “mildly infuriating” part of this post for me. Criticizing YouTube for pushing subscriptions on its users is 100% justified, but posting rage-baity screenshots of low-quality websites without any sources or context is probably not the way to do that.

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        The time for YouTube to ask for more money was before they made hundreds of unpopular decisions and drove away literally hundreds of creators that I liked.

        • kirk781@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Where are they now? On Nebula? I stopped watching much YouTube since couple of years, though I had a decent feed back in the day.

          Ironically, I still do use YouTube Music despite it’s failings when compared to Spotify(no third party app support or shitty search results even now) but Atleast it worked for me when Amazon Prime Music refused to play in any web browser on Linux for me.

          • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most of the creators I liked are on Twitch now or have quit. A very small amount made the pivot to Patreon. Nebula creators are often very successful youtubers who are smart enough to make a new business, though some are academics who don’t do so well on youtube. I use youtube music too! And pay for it… And I’m invested, I want alternatives. I was about ready to download all of my YouTube music stuff and go hop onto band camp, despite that it would be many times more expensive. I just wanna be treated right.

      • ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they unbundled Music from it and made it cheaper I would actually consider it. I don’t need the music, the family has Spotify.

        As it stands it is more expensive for my family than actual streaming services.

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’ve bundled music into it because music costs them a fraction as much as the video side while letting them charge 70% of a spotify subscription cost to make it a “good deal”

          Bundles are great if and only if you need and use everything in the bundle. Businesses love bundles because they know you won’t use it all.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ads are fucking annoying, but I’m still not sure how people are answering this question.

      What should YouTube’s business model be?

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We can start with non-intrusive and non-personalized ads without any tracking.

        Then if Google could stop getting greedier, they would have a business model that could sustain Youtube.

        • Jako301@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Non-personalized ads pay a fraction of the money targeted ads can get you.

          Non intrusive ads are pretty much just amal banner ads on the side, they pay near to nothing.

          Youtube barely makes any money as is, if you introduce even one of these changes they are far into the red again.

          Now if we also remove any tracking, then Google has no reason at all to keep it going and will just shut it down.

          I despise Google too, I avoid them like the plague, my phone is deggogled and all my apps come from third party storefronts. But YouTube simply is not a profitable business without personalised ads and tracking.

      • elrik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly I don’t understand what’s wrong with the subscription model. You get YouTube ad free and YouTube music.

        • rasputin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          People’s relationship with YouTube is weird. I guess cause it used to be free the expectation is that it should always be free but back in the day the content wasn’t worth paying for.

        • Another3quenc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well I paid for the ad free subscription but they sent an email that that doesn’t exist anymore and my subscription will cancel itself this month. Guess it wasn’t profitable enough… And that stinky move is why I won’t pay anymore.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Make the ads less awful is one way. Figure out a better way to analyze the video so you can put the ads in reasonable places, or let the uploader specify ad breaks. Limit the length of ads. Prevent repetitive ads within a certain timespan. Let users block particular advertisers. If the ad experience wasn’t so terrible, I wouldn’t block them.

        Beyond that, they could

        • offer a merch store where creators could put stuff and YouTube takes a hosting and processing fee
        • paywall 4K quality (maybe even 1080 and up)
        • allow big creators to pay $X for hosting in exchange for no ads being run on their videos

        Also they have to fix the copyright strike system. They could even make money off of it by charging claimants for copyright claims and holding the money in escrow until the review is completed, with that money going to YouTube if the claim turns out to be fraudulent or being refunded if it’s legit.

        There are lots of ways, and they’re smart people.

      • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The could make everything above 1080 quality subscription only, or charge uploaders for the storage. This would probably also cut down on the low quality spam Channels that only exists for ad revenue…

      • nicetomeetyouIMVEGAN@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Take googles 60 billion profit and stop complaining. But unfortunately that’s not reality.

        The growth of YouTube’s revenue has always been steadily climbing. But it’s far too slow to be a competitive investment. It’s only like a percentage or two per year, that’s not a rate that investors want to see. So yeh Google is putting like a couple of percent more ads on YouTube every year that is necessary to stay somewhat relevant in the market.

        Of course there is a limit, at some point you can’t put more ads into your system. I think they feel they are at that limit, and they are, it’s getting insane with the ads. . They try to get some percentage of people to stop ad block or some percentage to subscribe.

        But it’s just delaying the inevitable demise. At some point they are out of people to milk for money, so growth will stop. So investors will pull out and YouTube will stop existing. This is just how it works.

        Stop feeling bad. Someone or something will take its place. It will start small and grow and grow until it also dies. They could have 60 billion profit ‘forever’ but that’s not how capitalism works. Capitalist are going to capitalist and there is nothing you can do about it. It doesn’t matter what business model, or user experience, or quality. No capitalist cares. You and I care, but you and I are just secondary, afterthoughts, inconveniences. They just want us to do as they say, play the game, and stop complaining…

        But it’s already a business that is making money and turning a profit for Google. And when I say Google I mean Alphabet, but that’s just set up to obfuscate, so Idc.