Response from Martin Woodward, GitHub’s VP of Developer Relations:

Sorry for the inconvenience @koepnick - while searching across all repos has required being logged in for a long time, when we enhanced the search capabilities earlier in the 2023 we had to extend this to repos as well (see https://github.blog/changelog/2023-06-07-code-search-now-requires-login/).

This is primarily to ensure we can support the load for developers on GitHub and help protect the servers from being overwhelmed by anonymous requests from bots etc.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s okay. We need to move some shit off GH anyway. They’re basically a monopoly on FLOSS code.

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s 10-20x more searched for than Gitlab, and even more compared to smaller alternatives

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ok. But alternatives exist and users have choice. If Github fucks up tomorrow, a user exodus can be triggered just like that. It’s not too hard to migrate from it.

          Plus the open source code space is vast. Huge. And the means of distributing it are quite diverse.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah? When was the last time you clicked on a “Source Code” link and got anything other than a link to GitHub or a direct download of a tarball?

        Sure, alternatives exist – I could name half a dozen right now – but no one uses 'em.