• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      And hes blaming the Feds for it.

      The south wanted to force the North to treat escaped slaves as stolen property.

      The North said they were people.

      So the south tried to force the feds into helping them.

      The feds told the south “state rights, the Fed can’t do that”.

      So the South started a civil war against the federal government, in an attempt to get a more powerful federal government.

      Which actually did work? The federal government went ahead and banned slavery outright during the war. Something Lincoln had spent years saying the federal government couldn’t do.

      So by trumps logic:

      When conservatives try to do something, we should just do the opposite because if they fight a civil war over it, that’s what’ll happen anyways

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        10 months ago

        The feds told the south “state rights, the Fed can’t do that”.

        It’s worse. The Feds told the South “Okay, we’ll make it law.” And that still wasn’t enough for the South.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t even think it was a double meaning, he means exactly what he said. The traitor and a whole lot of cultists are going to swing eventually.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    10 months ago

    They’ll sacrifice their lives for a person who is demonstrably the actual biggest loser in history, and he just gets more loser-y, folks, okay… If any of you are starting to have your memories fade, here’s a quick refresher to read this morning and then copy and send to your aunt karen in Missouri.

    • 0 re-elections won
    • 1 term president
    • 2 times impeached
    • 3 marriages
    • 4 inch lifts in his shoes
    • 5 kids, from 3 different mothers
    • 6 bankruptcies
    • 7 US Capitol police suing him for Jan 6 terrorist insurrection and murder of police
    • 8 trillion + dollars added to the US debt in a single term
    • 9 trump lawyers sanctioned by federal judge for lying in frivolous election fraud lawsuits and ordered to pay defendant’s legal fees
    • 10 years that trump paid $0 in income taxes between 2000 and 2015. ($0 to cops, teachers, roads, prisons, disaster relief, etc)
    • 11 trump associates charged with serious crimes over the past 5 years
    • 12 million votes (the big lie) - trump claims he won the 2020 election by 12 million votes when in reality, he lost by about 7 million votes.
    • 13 of August, 2021 - one of multiple days that trump was supposed to magically become president again according to Qanon and a crack addicted pillow salesman (the two most respected information sources in the gop)
    • 14 year old girl in a youth choir that trump approached in 1992 to say, “Wow! Just think - in a couple years I’ll be dating you.”
    • 15 originally confirmed cases of COVID in the US trump said would soon be, “down to close to zero.” followed by, “like a miracle, it will disappear.” - over 1,000,000 Americans have since died of COVID and it continues to kill 4 years later.
    • 16 years old - age of daughter ivanka when she hosted “miss teen” pageant and, according to long time trump associate Noel Casler, “trump called her over in the middle of a rehearsal and had her give him a lap dance while he leered at the crew.”
    • 17 known trump and russia investigations from local, state and federal prosecutors
    • 18 gop senators that ignored trump threats / warnings and supported Biden admin’s infrastructure bill.
    • 19 as in COVID19 - trump was verified as the single largest source of disinformation on the virus, with a Cornell study claiming that 38% of the “misinformation conversation” originated with trump
    • 20 the day in January, 2021, when Biden was sworn in despite trump inciting a violent insurrection to stop election verification at the US Capitol.
    • 21 gun salute that trump ordered for himself when he left office after a humiliating defeat, even though he never served in the military, famously called military members “losers” and “suckers” and actively avoided the draft with a cowardly “bone spurs” excuse.
    • 22 date in August, 2021, when Alabama hate rally crowd booed trump for finally saying people should get vaccinated, only after 700,000 Americans have died due mostly to his failure as president
    • 23 as in wrestlemania 23 in 2007 where trump, a cartoon level failure with no other prospects, participated in a fake bet that a proxy wrestler would win a fake fight on his behalf or he would shave his wig and hair plugs off.
    • 24 day in August, 2021, when trump actually filed a lawsuit in Florida court against YouTube, a private company, demanding that they reinstate his YouTube channel like a desperate, irrelevant embarrassment with no platforms left to abuse.
    • 25 plus credible sexual assault allegations against trump, spanning decades and with accusers starting as young as 13 years old at time of assault.
    • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      The fact that anyone follows this child trauma-born orangutan is proof to me that humanity is NOT an inherently rational species, and that most people don’t bother putting in effort to think about anything.

  • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    At a campaign event in Iowa today, former President Donald Trump explained that the Civil War didn’t have to happen. “So many mistakes were made,” Trump said. “I think you could have negotiated that.”

    “This is something that could’ve been negotiated,” he added. “…That was a tough one for our country…. Abraham Lincoln? If you negotiated it, you probably wouldn’t even know who Abraham Lincoln was… That would’ve been okay…. I know it very well… I know the whole process that they went though. They just couldn’t get along.”

    They couldn’t get along,…because one side wanted to keep all their slaves.

      • Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s how he speaks. I am a foreigner and when he first came at the head of the USA, the journalists didn’t know how to translate his speaches. Usually, the sentences have one meaning that you can translate into one sentence, thanks to the context. With him, it’s a couple of sentences with no link and the last sentences have absolutely no context. You just can’t translate this.

  • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s pretty much what Lincoln tried to do with his inaugural speech after several states had seceded already. He tried to talk them down and promised that the North would not interfere with their life heavy-handedly but that insurrection was too serious for him to ignore. And then they stormed Fort Sumter and forced his hand. He didn’t even commit to the cause of abolishing slavery until the third year of the war.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s frustrating that historically lost causes based on hatred, like the slavers of the Confederacy or any form of fascism, are never fully punished for what they do. Each time a war ends the history writers make thousands of exceptions for people who were clearly working for their own self interest at the cost of society.

    Any time a right wing, conservative cause loses (which is all the time based on history) they need to be burned bad: take away their money and livelihoods and make them reliant on social services.

    • themelm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Would that actually work? How long should the north have kept armies raised and occupied the south to completely root out all bad guys? How long of doing that before you become the bad guys? How would you keep the trials from just becoming witch hunts?

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh give me a break with this bullshit. We got almost 100 years of Jim crow because racists and cowards like you were more worried about the feelings of white supremacists than doing the right thing. Reconstruction was working.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          If the south hadn’t even seceded, I guarantee you you would still have had those laws happen. The biggest difference would have been the south kept their slaves longer if they never seceded.

          Being too weak on human rights was the problem for Jim Crow, not being too weak on rebellion. The hypothetical occupiying armies would have been there to squash rebellion, not try to further elevate rights of the black population.

          While more equal rights might have been a more prevailing sentiment in the free states, they didn’t have the will to stand up for those equal rights in states hundreds of miles away. They might have managed to abolish slavery in 12 or so years federally if left to their own devices, but they weren’t going to police the nuance of citizens’ rights in states they knew so little about.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        You can’t throw the book at every vague supporter, but you CAN throw it at participants and organizers as a show of what the next guys will get.

        People would think twice about insurrection if everyone who J6ed faced charges as enemy combatants instead of the slap on the wrist crap most of them are getting.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          There’s a fine line to walk between letting folks off too easy and making it even worse by going scorched earth on them.

          If they were treated as enemy combatants with their rights as citizens revoked, then you are likely to inspire more anger and righteousness than fear.

          The mindset of those that are receptive to the position of the insurrectionists is that government is undemocratic, corrupt, and authorian against them. It deflates their position when those folks get due process and frequently get off with light sentences. Incidentally, a lot of the key people got 4 to 18 years in prison, hardly a slap on the wrist.

          Lots of precedent where any initial offense is forgotten in the wake of an oppressive response. The best results have been where the “victor” exhibits a reasonable response rather than trying to go all in, especially when you are dealing with millions of folks roughly on the side of the guilty.

          • Facebones@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Sure, but by your logic - the initial offense has happened. An attempt against the government was made. We’ll see how the soft buttpat response goes.

            When they do it again - enemy combatants. Full stop. The anger and righteousness is already there, rooted in false narrative nonsense. You can’t buttpat your way out of that. If they get a buttpat, it’s cause the govt knows they’re right, and they’re emboldened. If you throw the book at em it’s cause the govt is against the people and they’re emboldened. They played their hand, and that hand is violence.

            Fuck em, hang em all - it’s what they were trying to do, it’s only fitting. No tolerance for the intolerant.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I am a bit concerned that all this ire aimed at the plebes trying to storm the capitol building detracts from the more significant threat. They were trying to influence election officials to ‘come up with votes’ and failing that, forging fake electors into the process and refusing to certify results. The “white collar” attempts to subvert the election are a more significant threat than a bunch of randos trying to break into the capitol building.

              But with respect to the people storming the capitol building, as stated, key folks in that got years of prison time. I would consider that more than a “soft buttpat”. Nearly half of participants received at least some prison time.

              • Facebones@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Oh they should 100% face the same fate. I’d say hang them too but I don’t have the easy line from treason to hanging that I do for people who actively participated in violence.

                This whole Democrat shtick of “we can’t say anything bad about Republicans or stop them from fucking everything because it’s undemocratic to be mean to fascists” needs to stop.

                If they try to subvert the process, lock them up for life. If their followers get mad and take action a la J6, take them down and take prisoners. They are enemies of this country, it’s time to treat them as such. We’ve tried giving an inch for decades and every time they take a mile.

  • Szymon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 months ago

    This idiot also wanted to cure your COVID infected body with bleach injections and UV light

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 months ago

    Surprised he’s not calling it the “War of Northern Aggression” just to really try to suck off his base.

    • MuhammadJesusGaySex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The north is racist too. He wouldn’t want to alienate them. After all Montana has the highest concentration of white supremacists per capita.

      California apparently has the most hate groups by total amount.

      https://thehill.com/changing-america/respect/578513-the-10-us-states-with-the-most-hate-groups/

      I verified Montana with another website. If you want to know the full list of per capita. Just google it. But all that hate isn’t trapped in the south. Though, I admit that there is more than enough to go around down here.

      • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Montana was not a state until well after the end of the civil war so it isn’t a northern or southern state.

        • MuhammadJesusGaySex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Right. What I was saying is. Calling the civil war the “war of northern aggression” may make some of the racists that currently live in the northern states upset.

          I meant northern as a literal geographic area. Like how Oregon is in the north. As opposed to some arbitrary line like the 31st parallel, or the mason Dixon line.

          No, much like I said in my comment. Now, just like then. The racists are everywhere. They are in the north and the south. Trump welcomes racists from all over the US irregardless of geographical location.

    • Tyfud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      They already call it that. I think he’ll need to up the game a bit.

      Maybe the alternative war to make America England again?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      They never hear that. It’s always about “bipartisanship.” And these are who we’re stuck voting for to stop the Republican agenda. Fucking hell.

      • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        The other thing I hear from status quo warriors is “We want things back to normal.”

        No, we fucking don’t! Normal sucks donkey ass for a lot of people.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          And they don’t want to put things back to normal anyway. They always want whatever the status quo is maintained.

          • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            “If normal was progressive and helpful, then we want whatever came before that” is the subtext. It’s moustache-twirlingly evil.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      The Democrats are getting rich.

      They couldn’t care less what you and I think about their paid inaction at the federal level.

    • Zozano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I only came to the comments to see if people were discussing the picture lol.

      I can think of so many memes to ‘improve’.

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Negotiate? He’s suggesting things would’ve gone better if we’d agreed to mostly keep slavery but soften it a little in exchange for concessions? Well, that’s horrifying.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That precise negotiation is how we got the civil war, as well as a number of other completely busted, antidemocratic US institutions like the Senate. Making compromises with slavers.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s all so bad. The House should have thousands of members to give states proportional representation, but instead Alabama votes count for more than California votes. In turn, this makes the electoral* college unbalanced too in the same way. There’s a huge bias towards rural voting power.

        *damn auto correct 😠

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          And then people act like “real America” is like a suburb in Ohio or rural parts of Louisiana.

          There’s ~4 million people in Louisana. There’s ~8 million people in New York City alone. Cities are as or more “real” than the other parts.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          this makes the electrical college unbalanced

          Yeah they really need to get some more positively charged ions up in that bitch

        • nbafantest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          To be fair, California hasn’t built any new housing in 60 years.

          California could have 60-70 million people. Instead we are just handing 30 million voters over to Republican states.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            That, paradoxically, increases California’s proportional voting power. Popular vote doesn’t decide elections.

            • nbafantest@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              If California had 70million citizens, current district sizes are around 700k. So it would have about 100 districts. It would have about 1/5th of the total electoral college vote.

              It’s honestly insane that New York and Cali have purposefully handed over political power to republicans since the 60s.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                As I understand it, because every state still has to have at least 1 House member (and thus 1 electoral college vote). Without increasing the size of the House then all that can do is reduce the proportional power of each vote within California. The State itself becomes more powerful, sure, but the votes of citizens within California are worth less and less as the population grows. It’s a really bad system.

                • nbafantest@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Each district is roughly 700k people. A few districts are bigger, a few are smaller.

                  California could completely dominate the US House of Representatives and the electoral college.

                  A state becomes more powerful by having more people.

                  California has much much more power than Wyoming, even tho each voter in Wyoming might have a tiny bit more power than each voter in Cali.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hard to know with Trump.

      His usual way of “negotiating” is to demand what he wants is the limit, while demanding that the other party capitulate to whatever is best for Trump.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maybe my vote could have been 2/3 of a white vote? And we could negotiate with women. Maybe they could just tell us who to vote for but not actually do any voting and we could then have a family vote?