The most famous forms of Holocaust denial and revisionism tend to focus on Jews, casting doubt, for example, on how many were exterminated in the camps. But denying the impact the Nazis had on the other groups they targeted, including queer and trans people, disabled people and Romani people, is still Holocaust denial. Maybe someone should tell J.K. Rowling.

  • Leviathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    one is history illiterate asshole while the other is special-grade asshole

    I contend that they are the same type of asshole with the same goal but they present their arguments in a way that makes a portion of the populace jump ever so slightly onto their side. If they can get people to agree that one portion of the Holocaust was more tragic than another then they have already begun to chip away at what made the Holocaust so horrendous. Holocaust denial isn’t about not thinking it happened, it’s about pretending they think it didn’t happen to devillainize their side. Just because they picked one group affected by the Holocaust over another doesn’t make it any less Holocaust denial, it just makes it Holocaust denial that doesn’t bother you, meaning they won.

    First they came for the Communists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a Communist
    
    Then they came for the Socialists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a Socialist
    
    Then they came for the trade unionists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a trade unionist
    
    Then they came for the Jews
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a Jew
    
    Then they came for me
    And there was no one left
    To speak out for me
    

    Classic nazi tactic to come for groups you don’t care about so they can eventually come for you.