Put some lava there. Knowing them, they’re probably digging straight down.

I think it’s “Yes, thank you”.

Perhaps person A’s prediction would improve

But in this hypothetical scenario of explicitly unweighted coins, Person A was entirely correct in the odds they gave. There’s nothing to improve.

How about this:

Two people give the odds for the result of a coin flip of non-weighted coins.

Person A: Heads = 50%, Tails = 50%

Person B: Heads = 75%, Tails = 25%

The result of the coin flip ends up being Heads. Which person had the more accurate model? Did Person A get something wrong?

a heck load of chemicals injected into a block of soy beans paste.

Everything’s a chemical, this is just language used to make things sound scary. The taurin that cats need that isn’t found in vegan cat food is identical to the taurin in meat.

Additionally WE can make that choice but cats that are obligatory carnivore would never choose vegan as they are obligated to do so.

If you’re so concerned about a cat having a supposedly harmful (the science on this disagrees with you, to be clear) choice made for itself by the human who is keeping it, why are you fine with the choices made for the animals that are kept in awful conditions and then killed for cat food with meat in it? Those animals are also kept by humans and have choices made for them that are unnatural to them, and they are most certainly being harmed.

If a vegan diet is ethical for a cat is unknown.

The science on this is pretty clear, and there are plenty of examples of cats thriving on a vegan diet for many many years. Of course, it’s important to consult a specialist and give the cat regular checkups if switching its diet like this.

Women are you in the car park and the way you are in the house and I can do it for you and you can do it for me and you can do it for me

lol

I watched it with a friend, that made it at least somewhat bearable (while talking over it at parts and stopping after around 75% of it)

Yeah, 4 seasons, I finished them all now and had a great time!

Apparently there’s even a spin-off, though I think I’m gonna wait a bit until I watch that, to not burn out on this show.

I’ll do you one better: just replace the “shorts” with a “v”, and it’ll redirect you to the video version as well.

Bonus: since the “shorts” part of the URL is between two slashes, double clicking it will mark just that part.

Octopath Traveler would be great, ty for doing this giveaway! :)

I started watching The Boys again last night, jumping in at the beginning of S3. Watched a whole 6 episodes, good stuff!

So, they’re power bottoms?

I thought this said “cannabis”, and I was so confused lol

“Their answer is long and nuanced, while mine is short, simple, and makes me feel good about myself. Therefore I’m correct.”

Noooooo ;-;

Maybe those will be exceptions, and it counts those like the hair on top of my head, my eyebrows etc? Or I just need to make sure I take the no hair pill first, and then the other one lol

1 3 9, water is already my favourite drink :p

I haven’t watched this video, but I do wanna point out that this channel also made a video called “vegan diets don’t work”, which was full of correlation = causation, cherry picking or straight up misrepresenting data, and just generally going against the scientific consensus on several key issues in that video.

I’m strapped for time, so I’ll just paste one of the comments under that video here:

Veganism is not healthy because more than 50% of vegans quit -> following the same logic: exercising is not healthy because 90% of people quit after the first 3 months

• Bases knowledge of Western Prices almost century-old studies (1927 and 1939) instead of relying on the most recent state-of-the-art studies

• Refined foods = Veganism (folowing this logic, white bread is only eaten by vegans)

• Netherlands and Montenegro have the tallest people in the world and at the same time they drink a lot of milk, this is correlation and not causation.

• The study itself overlooked individuals and instead focused on average, this is an ecological fallacy. We could say the same about smoking, if you plot smoking and timespan per country we could say the more people smoke the longer their lifespan is, which is ridiculous.

See for yourself the remaining of the video, this continues on!

So probably take this one with a big grain of salt.

Idk, I’m 28 and know like 95% of these. Maybe I just spend too much time online lol

Like this? :p