Could you show an example? GOG has no DRM, for any game. That’s kind of their thing. I was wrong, there’s a full list.

There isn’t much of the brand that is Canadian anymore, it’s all Chinese owned. So unfortunately I don’t believe that reasonable take is the actual one.

Appreciate the sentiment, but rule 1 of the community states that you should keep the original title when submitting an article, using the body or a comment to put your commentary.

Got it, a xenophobic bigot. I won’t engage further, you’re not worth it. I encourage others to simply block you, as I’m doing right now.

So if I understand you correctly, you’re saying that him being a Muslim makes it inevitable that he will apply Sharia law (or something equivalent) to NYC?

Just say the racist thing you’re only implying, for all of us to see.

As said by another, no need to offer the service worldwide, no need to be competitive, just need not to give them our data. It will cost a lot yes, but I’d much rather that than giving freely all our data to a fascist government and a kowtowing corporation.

Also nice moving of the goalposts, you first said that the article’s title was deceptive, “because the datacenters are in Canada”. I maintain my claim that this changes absolutely nothing to the story.

What does that change? It’s still property of Microsoft, and they’ve stated quite recently that US law will override any notion of sovereignty or ownership. So the datacenters could be anywhere, the data is, for all intents and purposes, american.

Well, the thing is, you just admitted that your initial comment about Firefox being more vulnerable was based on nothing, since you did your research only after. Then you so quickly went over the data you looked for that you only saw that total that seemed to confirm your unfounded bias, where the tables have that very readable color code to them, making 2015 and 2016 really jump to the eye.

Of course, now that the data you found goes against your bias, you just look to discredit it, instead of thinking “you know, maybe this isn’t as clear-cut as I thought it was”.

So no, no charity there. I’ll keel it for those who act in good faith, thank you.

For starters, if I had not called you out, you wouldn’t have provided sources. So my point still stands, your previous message, unsourced, was fear mongering.

Onto your data. Funny that you wrote the total from 2015, not mentioning that 127 of those code execution vulns are from 2015 and 2016… So 8 code exec since 2017, versus 85 for Chrome. I don’t think we can attribute that only to market share.

Either you don’t know how to read a table, or you purposefully ignored that part, perhaps hoping no-one would click on your links?

almost certainly has more vulnerabilities than Chromium browsers

Unless you have real world data that confirms it, this is just fear mongering.

I haven’t seen anyone, even the worst of them, pretend we’re already at AGIs. Granted some of them pretend we’re getting close to AGIs, which is an outrageous lie, but a different one.

I’m not white and from now on I’m even more likely to get shot than before.

I’d argue that with him alive and continuing to spew his hate and calls for violence, that probability would have unfortunately continued to go up. It went up by a bigger margin with his death sure, but it wouldn’t have stopped with him not being shot.

That being said, I do feel very bad for you and all those affected.

I just want to add that “Look into it” is never a good argument; either you know of a study that shows this, in which case just link it (you’re the one with the burden of proof here), or don’t comment about imaginary data.

Isn’t being a fascist also a requirement?

Your answer does reveal that I may not have understood your previous message, but it only confuses me more…

What are the 2 sides we are talking about here?

I’ll bite: what’s wrong with the other side?

In my city there was a photo radar set up at a construction site that issued 10 tickets to the same vehicle over a period of 2 weeks all before the driver recieved the first ticket in the mail. How does that improve road safety (assuming that actually the intent of photo radar)?

So, one unique example where it took 2 weeks to have an effect is enough to say that they don’t work? While there are studies available through a simple word search that show the opposite? I’m confused here, but perhaps I misunderstood that 2nd paragraph.

You couldn’t, because there’s no actual study on this, because it does not work. It’s also why you won’t. Troll being a troll, block and move on.

Cat nail caps are not a perfect answer to this problem, but still an infinitely better one than amputation (please don’t use the term declawing as it’s extremely misleading).

There’s also ways to encourage your cat to use scratch pads and the like instead of your furniture (cats hate citrus for example, so a bit of that where they want to scratch and they’ll find a new spot immediately).