Mine is Henry Ford. He’s the catalyst of the 40 hour work week and 5 days a week that has been standard to the present day. Because we’re seeing now how little that really does for anyone anymore, where people are having to sacrifice more of their freedom to work second jobs or more hours than they should.

I don’t think it’s his fault directly for those reasons, but him thinking the 40 hour/5 day a week plan is a good one is just a poor reading into the future with the way it’s gone since the establishment.

  • gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You do know that his 40hours a week was a dramatic reduction in working hours compared to the norm at that time?

  • dotslashme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m going to go with Leopold II of Belgium because of the atrocities this fucker unleashed upon the democratic republic of the Kongo.

    Kissinger also come to mind, but he’s not been dead long enough to be brought back yet, I think I’ll leave that fucker to a generation that doesn’t get hypertension just hearing the name.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Henry Fucking War Crimes Kissinger

    He lived a long life and died peacefully, thinking he got away with it all. That only means bringing him back for punishment would be the perfect surprise of an afterlifetime.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Solid choice.

      I’ve been reading a book about the Theranos scam and learned he was on their Board of Directors, and it made me a little happy to know that, at least, he got taken in by a con woman and lost a shit ton of money.

  • ripcord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    No one. There’d not really any point I can think of to “punish” them at this point except satisfying some creepy, sadistic sense of “justice”.

    • nagaram@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The best punishment is undoing their damage and teaching their sins to future generations as a warning.

      And using their Graves as a gender neutral bathroom when we wanna scratch the sadistic justice itch

    • guillem@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Counterpoint: dictators that died in their beds because of course they couldn’t be prosecuted under their own regime and have them undergo fair trial. Bonus points if their victims are still alive so they can get some closure. Spain’s Franco comes to mind.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Man, a hard choice here.

    I’ll go with Columbus. It takes a special kind of motherfucker to arrive in an unknown country, observe peaceful people living in tranquility, and your first thought THAT YOU EVEN WROTE DOWN was: “Holy fuck I can steal all their shit if I want to.”

    And then you go on to make them basically extinct.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    Henry Kissinger. Whenever you needed the most depraved, amoral, anti-democratic take on anything, whether it was the Vietnam war or the Khmer Rouge or the civil rights movement, you could always count on Henry farking Kissinger.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have a celebratory drink every time I remember he’s dead, I don’t care what else I’m doing, it can wait

      • LiveFreeDie8@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        For decades I was always surprised he was still alive. He seemed to live forever commenting on foreign policy. Just saw your post and was surprised he had died.

  • andyburke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can you explain more why you think Ford’s 40hr week is bad?

    I thought it represented a pretty marked improvement compared to typical job requirements at the time?

    Ford is no hero. A documented anti-semite with lots of other bad takes, but I am not clear on why you would pick his working hours as the thing to highlight.

    • Frozyre@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, as I’ve said, he made that idea up in a time where it made sense and did well for it’s time. But it started to not be a feasible system every turn of the decade and by the time we’ve reached the 2000s, the idea simply isn’t cutting it anymore. Moreso in today’s time.

      A lot of ideas that were made in the early 1900s through the 50s came about in a time where it made sense and did well, least for a while. But many variables since then just diminished it’s use. People aren’t making as much in 40 hours than they should and they aren’t making ends meet in those 5 days. People are expected now to have two jobs, more hours and no time for themselves or anyone around them.

      • weeeeum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why is it his fault that in today’s society, the notion of a 40 hour work week is slowly becoming obsolete? Should we not celebrate the invention of the light bulb because LEDs are more efficient?

      • NotAnOnionAtAll@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        So his “crime” that you want to punish him for is that he improved things in a way that made sense in the context of his time instead of looking decades into the future and forcing a drastic change immediately long before society was anywhere near ready for it? Seriously?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thought it represented a pretty marked improvement compared to typical job requirements at the time?

      To answer your question as written - based only on context - yes, you did think that.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      they wouldn’t care unless you literally did a Christmas Carol-esque past/present/future consequence tale with them. They have enough fans here in the present to shield them from guilt.

    • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Nederlands
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Reading more on her and wow, she’s a piece of work. What a turd. She’s not even conservative, but reactionary.

      How did she get that reactionary in the first place? At least she died of cancer. That’s good. But she should have died earlier.

      • dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        One of the greatest political operatives of the 20th century, in terms of how widespread her horrifying legacy is. She only cosplayed as a frumpy housewife all while trying to lock the US an eternal fictionalized version of the 1950s.

      • dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Sorrey I missed your question about her radicalization.

        It stemmed from separation anxiety due to her mother working while she was young. Which metastasized into a hatred of women in the workforce. Ironic given how much she worked with men who viewed her as nothing more than a novelty, all while she crafted much of the modern GOP ethos.