• Hildegarde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine a world where RICO was used to prosecute things like this instead of peaceful protesters.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      And making bets related to worker COVID-19 infections. That’s not even mentioning use of ICE as a weapon against labor. The owners and management are comic book level of vile human beings.

  • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like I just read a story about children working in meat processing factories. Guess we’re skipping right to The Jungle then.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    On the one hand, do I think they did it? 100% yes. On the other, am I surprised the law is signaling they might do something about it? Also yes.

    There have been dozens of credible reports of such violations, of children being maimed and losing limbs even, and now finally there’s a probe? Watching the law take this much time to announce it will begin to investigate what’s been in the news for years almost convinced me it didn’t want to do it at all.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, noooo. They have uhh… they have fairies come in and pluck only the ripest fruit at very livable wages… please don’t look in to this too closely. Definitely don’t go in to the shanty village and start asking questions.

          • Wogi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Frankly yes. This lantern doesn’t light mundanely and the darkness has spookies that bite. The only solution is fae torture.

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Definitely don’t go in to the shanty fairy village and start asking questions.

      • BonfireOvDreams@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Math equation says, plant eating requires less land, which means fewer workers exploited. Also I’m pretty sure plant farmers don’t have a 400% turnover rate. It’s almost like even if the math were equal, which it isn’t, killing animals all day is bad for your mental health.

        • CaptainAniki@lemmy.flight-crew.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I love that you’re getting downvoted for pointing out that yes, eating a majority of plants involves a significant less amount of human and animal suffering than taking those plants and running it through multiple massive, global, industries before an end product is finally sent to the same store as the plants.

            • bobman@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Pretty much how it is.

              I love veganism because it points out how hypocritical and cognitively dissonant people are. Just another fine example of the average 21st century homo sapien being an idiot while thinking they’re smart.

              I don’t expect more at this point.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            eating a majority of plants involves a significant less amount of human and animal suffering

            I don’t believe you have any proof of this

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Math equation says, plant eating requires less land, which means fewer workers exploited

          that doesn’t follow

          edit: this user never constructed a cogent argument, but, in the end, devolved into a hypocritcal spluttering rant making unfounded accusations, then announced they were blocking me. just in case you thought they could deal with skepticism.

          • BonfireOvDreams@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Let me be way way more specific for you than should be necessary. It takes more plants to feed animals than us to feed plants ourselves directly. E.g., a culture of animal product consumption requires more land to be cultivated and maintained to feed those animals before we can even feed the animals to us. This requires more workers to be exploited in the ‘consumption’ industry.

            If you are arguing that ‘well those workers will just be exploited in another business,’ you could make that argument about any change in the workforce where labor requirements are reduced. It’s not relevant if we are focusing strictly on the food system and the amount of workers required within it. If we continue this more broadly though, it’s still not necessarily true if we don’t assume a political/socioeconomic system that puts them in that position. So in a hypothetical far far future, if we for some reason still need human labor to work fields but have outsourced enough jobs to robotics elsewhere so as to have UBI for many citizens without work, it would still require less workers to focus on a plant based diet than a meat eating diet. Frankly, by reducing the amount of workers required in any instance, you inch ever closer to UBI. So if you want to inch closer to a society that doesn’t exploit workers generally, even from that point of view, The Vegans are still approaching this closer than meat eaters.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do agree that we should stop eating meat. It’d be a great relief to the environment, climate and all that too.

      That being said, I remember reading about conflict avocados and was like, “is there anything I like that I can feel guilt-free about!”

      • CaptainAniki@lemmy.flight-crew.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But meat eaters also eat all those things as well, so you don’t have to feel so guilty about it. Just reducing animal products makes a huge impact. I consider myself “vegan” but even I’ll have local eggs and the occasional cheese because, 1) There’s no such thing as vegan police 2.) I don’t give a fuck what anyone thinks. Life is short and I am far too pragmatic.

    • HoustonHenry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Tyson Boneless Breaded Childrens Fingers” sounds like it was typed up by someone dyslexic, but could also be an interesting Halloween product (made of candy hopefully) 😆

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “We take the legal employment and safety of each individual working in our facilities very seriously and have strict, longstanding policies in place for Perdue associates to prevent minors from working hazardous jobs in violation of the law…”

    They say they didn’t do it. Did they or is this just another another DOL shakedown?