The Republican congresswoman said “while none of my actions or words as a private citizen that night were intended to be malicious or meant to cause harm, the reality is they did and I regret that”

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What specifically is she apologizing for?

    Blowing a giant vape cloud in on someone’s head, smoking in front of a pregnant woman, jacking off a guy in public, dancing in a theater where everyone is sitting, flipping off the ushers, or lying about all of that stuff because she thought it wasn’t on camera?

  • Scooter411@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    1 year ago

    The past few days have been difficult and humbling, and I’m truly sorry for the unwanted attention my Sunday evening in Denver has brought to the community

    “I’m sorry I got caught”

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely. Before the video, she lied about it and downplayed it and accused others about falsifying the accusations. Suddenly there’s video and now she “apologizes” (she didn’t really, it was a fake apology, she didn’t say she’s sorry for what she did, she basic said she’s sorry others found it offensive, that’s not an apology) and she’s entirely quiet on all the lying she did beforehand about saying it was overblown.

      • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        She didn’t even really say she was sorry others found it offensive, it came off as saying she was sorry she got caught. I suppose that shouldn’t be surprising given the GQP. None of them have any shame and are only “sorry” when they get caught.

  • Clent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Republican voters need to stop littering our politics with their trash.

  • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 year ago

    How to describe the Boebert video. A sampling

    NYT: " touching and carrying on with her date"

    POLITICO: “appears to show Boebert and her male companion fondling each other sexually”

    NYP: “groped ‘Beetlejuice’ date in heavy-petting session”

    GUARDIAN: “eagerly groping each other”

    SALON: “fiddling with each other’s privates”

  • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 year ago

    Translation:

    The optics of my public sexual acts in front of children is super bad for my campgain strategy which is to yell about the existence of trans people is inherently a public sexual act.

  • mateomaui@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Honestly tho, how can you forget that you were vaping and a pregnant lady behind you was directly complaining to you about it? Didn’t remember, my ass. (edit: and your date offers this pregnant lady an alcoholic drink. Can see why he’s into her, they are both really dumb.)

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Republicans on public sex with children present

    she just had a moment of temptation, re-elect her.

    Republicans on a democrat standing on the street doing nothing

    IMPEEEEECHHH!!! SINNER!!! Think about the children who WONT see!!!

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Her values is calling black people the n word, underaged marriage, bribery, and whatever culture war is going on that week.

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously! She exposed herself and performed a sex act in front of children. She is an actual sexual predator and needs to be behind bars, full stop.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Falling short of ones values is only possible if you actually have values. Which she doesn’t.