NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says his party will bring forward a motion of non-confidence to bring down the Trudeau government in the next sitting of the House of Commons.

“The Liberals don’t deserve another chance,” Singh wrote in a letter on Friday. “That’s why the NDP will vote to bring this government down.”

  • psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just to remind everyone: Layton pulled this same stunt, toppling Martin’s government.

    The result was the loss of a number of progressive initiatives Martin’s people were working on, the election of fucking Stephen Harper and the most conservative Canadian political landscape since Borden. Science was suppressed, lslamophobia went from being a dogwhistle to a bullhorn, we narrowly avoided economic catastrophy. Harper even fucked with the Census in an attempt to remake Canada.

    A lot of dippers really idolized Layton, but honestly he was a shameless opportunist and I don’t forgive him for giving us almost a decade of Harper.

    And Singh is pulling the same fucking stunt.

    • Pixel@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Just to remind everyone: Layton pulled this same stunt, toppling Martin’s government.

      Refusing to support a sitting government mired in scandal isn’t a stunt—it’s taking a stand. Calling an election wasn’t just the right thing to do; it was unavoidable after the Office of the Auditor General laid bare the extent of corruption. This wasn’t a minor misstep—it was a government blatantly diverting public funds to secure its own re-election. Propping up such a government would have been a betrayal of public trust.

      Pinning the blame on Layton because the only viable alternative brokerage party to form government was the Conservative Party is absurd. That’s not on him; it’s on the corrupt Liberal party establishment of the time for destroying their own credibility. A lot of voters are only used to the reformed Liberal Party under Trudeau, but there was a point in time where the Liberal party apparatus was very different.

      Let’s be clear: the fault lies with those who abused their power, not with those who refused to stand by and enable it. Misrepresenting this as opportunism is a deliberate distortion of the facts, designed to deflect attention from the real issue—a government that deserved to fall. Just admit you’re pro-corruption and move on.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Poilievre is winning a majority no matter what, I’d rather get it out of the way sooner instead of sitting through another year of ineffective Liberal virtue signalling.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There a good chance PP will just get more conservative votes in already conservative areas and still end up with a minority.

        At that point he’ll have to find another party to work with and he’s already pissed them all off.

        • m0darn@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s a good chance PP will just get more conservative votes in already conservative areas and still end up with a minority.

          What are you basing this on?

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The way Canadian elections work.

            If more people in rural Alberta vote conservative it won’t add to their seat count but it’ll add to their lead in the polls.

            • m0darn@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yes, but what makes you think that that could possibly be what’s about to happen?

              I think it is far more likely that liberal voters turnout will be down because of trudeau fatigue, this will cost the liberals battleground ridings. I think conservatives will have higher turnout than normal in traditional red seats since there is now a chance of their vote mattering. And I think that will cost the liberals even more seats.

              I base this prediction on liberal party performance in the last two by-elections.

            • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Conservative voters always vote conservative in every election. Progressive voters and swing voters only vote whenever the hell they feel like it. If conservatives are going up in the polls, that means moderates or progressives are intending to vote conservative, (edit: or that fewer progressives or moderates are planning to vote at all) not that more conservatives are planning to vote instead of not vote.

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    One thing that I find interesting.

    Singh says he will introduce a vote of non-confidence. Is it possible that he’ll delay it for a little bit, to support (or negotiate with) the Liberals for longer than anything Poilievre would have planned.

    In other words, could it be to push the CPC onto their back foot for a bit?

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Liberals don’t deserve another chance, sure, but handing the election over to the conservative party? What the fuck…

    • Pixel@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why is it the responsibility of a third party like the NDP to keep up the Liberals in power?

      If the NDP can steal and win former Liberal seats, it seems really dumb not to capitalize on that opportunity. It’s not like the NDP will form government, nor will the Conservatives lose traction in the next 10 months. There’s a Conservative government coming in regardless of how you feel.

      • honc@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Except the NDP are unlikely to pick up many Liberal seats and will go from holding the balance of power to having no power. I don’t follow this logic.

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not, but when the country is frothing at the mouth over even more unhinged authoritarian/oligarchy leadership than what we have, NDP aren’t going to stand much of a chance on their own. All the going to do is drive more people to vote CPC

  • rabber@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Dang welcome to Trump’s Canada I guess. Scary times boys

    • Pixel@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      How would a Conservative government be equivalent to Trump’s Canada? I don’t really understand the alarmism. This government was already on it’s last days, and there’s always going to be a point in time where things must get worse to get better. Waiting 10 months to expect a different result other than a Conservative majority is just copium, and Trudeau had the option of not calling a snap election in 2021 too.

      • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        How would a Conservative government be equivalent to Trump’s Canada?

        Because Poilievre is acting just like Trump: Sowing division and mistrust, attacking vulnerable groups, courting extremists, attacking the process of government, displaying willful ignorance of government and the law, reducing complex issues to simple (and wrong) chants, and more.

        The Conservatives have set their sights on the first target - trans people - so if they get a majority, watch them strip basic human rights from members of the trans community. After that will probably be abortion; but not banning it of course, just removing any guarantee of access to safe, legal abortions.

      • rabber@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think Pierre will be easily bought out and let Trump have his way. Fresh water will be piped to the states during his tenure, and he will try to gaslight us into thinking it’s a good deal, that’s my prediction

        • Pixel@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          All governments everywhere frame their decisions in a way that is akin to gaslighting. If the majority of Canadians disapprove of Pierre’s actions, or we lose the trade war with the US in a meaningful way that deteriorates our standard of living, then they will lose the next election. It’s that simple.

          People blame Trudeau now for all of their ills, as though that he has the power to magically make the economy go up and down with a snap of his fingers. The Liberals made investments in key sectors all the time, including housing starts, climate change and social justice, many of which are never going to be meaningfully acknowledged by people that debate politics online. Pierre is ultimately subject to the same political pressures.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            or we lose the trade war with the US in a meaningful way that deteriorates our standard of living, then they will lose the next election. It’s

            Except that it will take decades to recover from that (if we ever do).

          • rabber@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            4 days ago

            I agree with you mostly except I’m pretty afraid of Trump and I fear irreversible damage in the next 4 years. If Trump wasn’t in office I wouldn’t be overly concerned about a CPC majority

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 days ago

    Can this wait until Feb 1? Give Canadians a bit more of a chance to see the US get fucked first.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        First sitting on the 27th, to be exact. Source.

        Yeah, I’m panicking a lot less now. And depending on the exact rules JT could prorogue it even further.

        Somebody in the media mentioned a Liberal leadership election; if he goes that way I’ll be “kalm” again.

        • Pixel@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          A Liberal leadership convention would require ~4-5 months. The Liberals would name an interim leader elected by caucus if JT steps down.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Really? Do you have a link to bylaws or something?

            A couple seems like plenty of notice to me under the circumstances.

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Maybe when Canada is fed up with the Cons, they’ll vote us in!”

    Shortsighted buffoons

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The only shortsighted buffoons I see are the Liberals who have thoroughly failed to meaningfully improve their voters’ lives and address any of the many social crises that are impacting us.

      • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The only shortsighted buffoons I see are the NDP who have thoroughly failed to meaningfully improve their voters’ lives and address any of the many social crises that are impacting us.

        The only shortsighted buffoons I see are the Conservatives who have thoroughly failed to meaningfully improve their voters’ lives and address any of the many social crises that are impacting us.

        Works with every party.

      • bluebadoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        How do you feel about response to COVID and the CERB payments?

        Personally, that was a federal win for me.

        • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You are failing to learn the lessons from our southern neighbour. These small wins from years ago will convince nobody. We can all see what’s happening with our eyes. And definitely don’t try to convince me because liberals don’t even campaign here.

      • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Drop the whataboutism. Hold yourself to a higher standard.

        All political parties are a blight on democracy. Case in point, party whips.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    “The Liberals don’t deserve another chance,”

    And Conservatives shouldn’t even get a chance, yet Singh is handing them power on a silver plate.

    Burning down the country and democracy in the West “to own the Libs” sounds like a plan we may never recover from.

    • Pixel@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The Conservatives will win either way. There’s nothing in the next 10 months that would prevent the Conservatives from winning short of PP beating up children.

      Voting no confidence now allows the NDP to viably compete for seats like Ottawa Centre where the liberals are weak and rebuild their influence and standing in the house. I don’t see why it’s the duty of every left-leaning party to prop up the Liberals as the natural governing party. Waiting 10 months isn’t going to cause the NDP to sweep into government, it might at best just delay the inevitable if they’re lucky, but more likely delaying will catastrophically wipe out their party by making them look like Liberal stage props.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t see why it’s the duty of every left-leaning party to prop up the Liberals as the natural governing party.

        It’s the third party fallacy all over again.

        • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          There is no fallacy. It’s a solid split between NDP and Liberals. And that’s really being propped up by the East. In the West it’s Conservative vs NDP.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s about optics.

        Canada is one of the last few full democracies out there, and seeing how the United States has already failed, to give up and surrender sends a strong message to other nations that democracy just doesn’t work.

        • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Its not giving up and surrendering for the NDP to not support thr liberals. Unconditionally supporting them no matter what because of fear of the conservatives would be surrendering.

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well, Jagmeet said just the other day that what Conservatives have been doing (with these non-confidence votes), was a game, and that he wasn’t going to play.

            Now, all of a sudden, he’s caved?

            Something either happened behind closed doors, or he’s surrendered.

            That’s how I see it, and I could be totally wrong.

        • Pixel@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          So you’re saying that if a viable parliamentary democracy is functioning as intended, it has failed?

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            viable parliamentary democracy is functioning as intended

            I guess that depends on your definition of functioning.

            Just the other day, the NDP leader said this: "We’re not going to vote in favour of any of their games because that’s what (the Conservatives are) doing. They’re playing games,” Singh told reporters after the vote was tallied. (SOURCE)

            And now he wants to play games with our future by handing Conservatives more power?

            We all know that the Conservative party in Canada and the Republicans in the US are not acting in good faith to bring benefit to the people, so is this how our democracy is supposed to work?

            We have a democracy FOR THE PEOPLE, and if the people aren’t benefiting from these “games”, then it’s not functioning as intended.

            In my opinion, of course.

            • Pixel@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Democracy’s success isn’t measured by how one person feels about an incoming government - it’s based on the strength of democratic institutions, and liberal democracies are further characterized by strong civil societies and human rights regimes. If the majority of Canadians want a Conservative government in power - why do you feel that preference shouldn’t be accepted?

              It doesn’t sound like you even want a democracy, you just want a one-party autocracy, given that you feel that people shouldn’t be allowed to have fluid political preferences. That’s a failure of democracy - a one party state with all decisions made by someone on Lemmy.

              I’m not happy about an incoming Conservative majority government either, but my gut reaction isn’t to start claiming that democracy in Canada has failed. I’m able to calmly acknowledge that there’s a party right now that is probably going to win a plurality of votes and ridings because the majority of voters align with their messaging. That’s not a failure of democracy, that’s a success of democracy.

    • Papamousse@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yup, and gov is in vacation until Jan 27th, so when they wil go back to work, Trump in its first week may have already destroyed a couple of things here and there in our economy

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Actually, that’s a good thing. Parliament blow up before he arrives. The government itself will continue to operate.

        Thanks, I thought they were coming back early January and was worried.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, WTF is he thinking? At least wait until October after we’ve had a chance to put out the Trump fire a bit.

      Hopefully it’s a bluff to get Trudeau to resign, but that’s not really the typical NDP MO.

      • Value Subtracted@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 days ago

        WTF is he thinking?

        For better or worse, he’s probably reached the point where he thinks they need to cut all remaining ties to the Liberals, and not be seen as propping them up, formally or otherwise.

          • Value Subtracted@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m torn on this.

            On the one hand, I agree that a PP government is a terrible thing.

            On the other hand, it’s hardly the NDP’s job to prop up another political party.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              4 days ago

              You want a two-party system, then. That’s pretty much the only way for parties to never work strategically.

                • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Somebody’s always propping up another party if you’re Germany or Norway or Spain, though, or you don’t have a government. That’s what I mean. We have something like 2.5 parties, so we’re not used to it, but it’s how it’s “supposed” to work.

              • Kichae@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                No. That’s not what they’re saying at all.

                The NDP is not in government. Trudeau did not form a coalition, he decided to form a single-party cabinet in a hung parliament. This is how this always plays out.If he wanted stability, he could have formed a coalition.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        WTF is he thinking?

        “The Bloc will let me do some performative grand standing. I hope.”

      • NotSteve_@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I hope so too but it doesn’t really seem like a smart move since it’d make their threats seem empty (though actually going through with this isn’t smart either…)

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Well, memories tend to be short in politics, and even then it’s only credibility-damaging if it gets called. If it was the conservatives I’d pretty much just assume it’s a bluff.

      • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, WTF is he thinking? At least wait until October after we’ve had a chance to put out the Trump fire a bit.

        Could it be thay he hopes the conservatives will take the fall for Trump’s chaos and be out of power quicker? Thats the only other angle Im seeing here.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          That would be a galaxy brain 4D chess move. And pretty edgy honestly - that’s a lot of damage done just for the sake of political points.

          I actually lean towards less-strategic, lower-pragmatism answers for this particular party. They have a reputation for blind partisanship.

  • BigCanucK42@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just saw that he is eligible for pension on Jan 24th… Do with what you want with that info

    • Pixel@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The pension is a red herring tossed around by morons. If he didn’t get the pension, he’d get a return of his contributions and just invest it in index funds. People make it sound like a $40k/year pension will make or break his retirement plans lmao.

      Parliament doesn’t sit until Jan 26. You still have to get input from NDP HQ and the caucus before you go around voting non-confidence. Freeland resigned a day before parliament was about to adjourn and y’all make it sound like it needed to be a gut reaction.