• Otter@lemmy.ca
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Post is locked for cleanup.

    Post reopened, please keep the instance rules in mind while commenting

  • VO0RHAMER@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trusts doctors enough to be cut open and have someone elses organ inserted into their body. Doesn’t trust doctors enough to get vaccinated

    • Otter@lemmy.caM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The comment below by @nomadjoanne is incorrect, since a COVID-19 infection has a higher risk for myocarditis than what the vaccine can cause. However, I’m choosing to keep it up because there are a lot of comments afterwards outlining WHY it is incorrect, and that’s helpful for dealing with the disinformation.

      I’m open to reviewing this again if people think it should be removed anyway

    • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      220
      ·
      1 year ago

      The vaccine was clearly rushed into production and saved a lot of vulnerable people’s lives. That does not mean it does not have risks that, for younger and healthier people, those might outweigh the benefits.

      But public hysteria and groupthink dictated that it had to be coerced on people.

      • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        150
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The vaccine underwent the exact same rigorous testing that literally every other vaccine or medication gets. The only difference is that COVID vaccines were given a free pass to the front of the line at each step necessary. As well, due to them having a much shorter timeline and higher competition, it was economical to run multiple tests in parallel that would normally have been done in series.

        It wasn’t “rushed” as in sloppy, it was “rushed” in that it was given priority in the various governmental queues.

      • terabytes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Perhaps, now that the vaccine has been around for years and there’s plenty of data on its efficacy and risks, you might cite some of those risks? Because the data I’ve seen shows that infection is still much worse for your health than vaccination, regardless of whether or not you are “young and healthier.” I would be very interested to see what data you have that shows otherwise. I quite like being proven wrong.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That does not mean it does not have risks that

        The benefits outweigh the risks, even in the young and healthy, so the vaccines are recommended to everyone.

        • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          58
          ·
          1 year ago

          Indeed. Because the young men dropping dead from heart inflammation all were sick due to climate change.

          • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            49
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I love how people mention heart inflammation from the vaccines, but they never talk about heart inflammation from COVID itself - it’s more common with COVID itself, and it’s more severe with COVID itself.

            But hey, gotta hate on the vaccines, am I right?

            • brognak@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              35
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              These are the same people who argue against wearing seatbelts and mandatory airbags because they could potentially be worse than an accident without them, which is ignoring the 99.999% of the time they help.

              • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                They do, that’s why you’re likely not vaccinated right now, and why people who are against it are not vaccinated.

                Freedom of choice does not mean freedom from consequences of choices. If you make a bad choice, you aren’t entitled to be free from the consequences of that choice.

              • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If you run around with Covid making others sick, you do not just weigh a risk for yourself, you are also inflicting it onto others. If too many do that, society breaks because hospitals get overwhelmed, firefighters and law enforcement are sick, the grocery store has to close and the government stops working. Children are unattended and whatever else.

                If you do not wear a set belt your broken body takes up a hospital bed too, or are you going to accept the weight of your decision and abstain from health care because you inflicted that harm on yourself? Be welcome to not wear a seatbelt then, but make sure to have a big sticker on your car that says: “My head injury was my choice, so do not help.”

      • OmegaII@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The vaccine went so fast because most of the part was already known and they had solution for other covid variants. They only needed to adapt it to attack the correct part of this covid 19 virus. It wasn’t a new study. It wasn’t rushed. And this person wasn’t healthy but terminal. Healthy, lol.

      • BucketHat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand this logic. It had to be quickly developed because the entire world population was affected by COVID. We’re talking about millions of deaths. Economies halted, everything literally went stand still and you expected the vaccine to take 3 years to develop?

        I’m sure it might have sounded scary to have medicine developed so rapidly but I don’t think you realize the scale at how it was developed because so many countries and companies dumped a ton of money researching a cure out the door as fast as possible.

        Sure there are side-effects but in that case the side effects were worth having versus the deaths of high risk individuals.

        Edit: reduced sensationalism

        • DV8@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure there are side-effects but in that case the side effects were worth having versus millions of deaths

          I mean, one of the most commonly mentioned side effects was something that happened in a much more serious form with a real COVID infection. It’s the easiest way to meet antivaxxers in the middle if they’re arguing in good faith. Even if there’s a significant side effect of myocarditis, it’s not nearly as common or heavy as the myocarditis die effect of an actual infection.

          • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            As I recall, all the side effects of the Covid vaccines are side effects present with other vaccines, and they are all auto-immune responses. You are at a much much greater risk of all of those if you actually caught Covid.

            I suppose there is a bit of calculus involved. If you are 100 times more likely to suffer from Guillain–Barré syndrome or myocarditis if you catch a disease, but the disease is exceptionally rare, it might not make sense to get a vaccine. In Covid’s case though, a substantial amount of the general population caught Covid, meaning that the overall risk was substantially reduced by being vaccinated.

            Some people just seem to have trouble with risks and percentages; shades of grey rather than black or white. Getting vaccinated isnt 100% the right call, it’s only 99.99+% the right call. Ironic that the same people were totally cool with a 0.5% of Covid killing them, never mind all the other severe side effects. You were asking them to make a choice between 99.99% fine vs. 90% fine or 99.9999+% non-lethal and 99.5% non-lethal. You look at the relative risks though and the vaccine was thousands of times more safe than catching Covid unvaccinated.

          • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Any sort of medical treatment has side effects. For instance I got diabetes, you know what the side effects of using Insulin is? Death. Do you know what the side effects of untreated diabetes is? Death. Do you know what the side effect of life is? Eventually death. We are all going to get there someday, but I mean might as well stretch it out as long as possible, way I see it. There’s so much I want to see, after all. Are the Leafs ever going to win the cup? Am I ever going to see retirement? Do I ever get my Corvette? This lady in the story is never going to have any of those answers, because they were too worried about side effects.

            That’s what I don’t get about these people barking about the side effects, I mean it might kill you or make you stupid, sure (I mean it’s possible, but highly unlikely). But so can falling out of bed in the morning. Or you know, COVID or whatever other disease you are trying to prevent. Was it raced out? I mean, sure. But pandemics, you know? Not a lot of time on anyones hands. And I’d say they’ve been pretty god damn effective. Like they bitch about shutting things down and the economy and mAH freedumbs, but then they bitch about racing out the vaccines, it’s like shit, what can we do to make you folks happy here?

        • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          because the entire world population was dying from COVID

          Okay I’m no anti vaxxer but this is just going to get you laughed at by the people you’re trying to convince.

          About 1% was at risk of death, and that’s no small number, and we all had to get vaccinated to protect them, and that’s fine. But outright stating the entire world population was dying is just laughable sensationalism.

          If you want to convince people, you’re never going to do it with sensationalism, especially when that sensationalism is so dramatic is flat out wrong.

          • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was overwhelming hospitals, which means people with other problems were dying, because ambulances were not getting to them, surgeries had to be postponed. If all your firefighters are sick, more people will die in fires and accidents. If a high number of people in a society get sick that society is breaking. No law enforcement, no health care, no working government, no grocery store.

            You are one of the people that complain when action is taken and works that that action wasn’t needed because it wasn’t that bad and when no action is taken how bad the government is. And Covid wasn’t at all the worst it could have been. There will be a next virus in the future and people like you will not have learned anything from this one and drive us into an even worse crisis, just by being stubborn.

            • towerful@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Best counter point is y2k.
              Huge publicity. Massive amounts of money spent.
              New year 1999/2000 was uneventful (except for parties).
              … Y2k was a hoax, waste of money… Wut?!

              It wasn’t. There’s is proof of such. It was removed/mitigated by a huge effort of developers.

              • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                “We spent millions of dollars and a year preparing and NOTHING HAPPENED! All that time and money wasted!”

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              You are one of the people that complain when action is taken and works that that action wasn’t needed because it wasn’t that bad and when no action is taken how bad the government is.

              Yup, that’s basically the entirety of the whole anti-vax thing in one sentence. Vaccines have been so effective at eradicating so many diseases people don’t have a concept of have deadly diseases can be and can’t grasp why getting a vaccine is so important to protect them from disease.

            • Cam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              1 year ago

              Stop watching the news man. None of what you said actually happened.

              • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It did not happen because most people stayed at home, were wearing a mask, followed social distancing rules, were working from home, kept their children at home, washed their hands and got the vaccine when it was available. Again, it did not happen because we stopped it from happening and now you go “it wasn’t that bad” ignoring the billions of people who stopped it from getting that bad.

                It’s like “seatbelts are against my freedom” and when everyone wears one to go “look people don’t die in car crashs that proofs seatbelts are unnecessary and only made up by the news” when the reason for them not dying is that they wear a seatbelt.

                • Cam@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The vaccine, a mysterious injection that was forced on the population, created by big pharma who has a repuation for dishonesty for decades. Comparing this to seatbelts is a horrible comparision. Seatbelts BTW are straps you wear to ensure you do not go flying out the wind shield during a car crash. No mystery around that, no closed source injection being pumped into your bloodstream when wearing a seat belt.

                  And COVID mass deaths would of not happen if life was allowed to go on as normal. There were places like South Dakota that did nothing authoritative and I do know South Dakota still exists, life goes on.

                  Again, stop watching the news. Unplug from the matrix and then you will see the source code to all of this madness.

        • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          55
          ·
          1 year ago

          Economies halted because the public freaked out. The vast, vast majority of healthy people were absolutely fine. Most of those who died, with respect, had relatively few years of life left anyway.

          Society should strive to keep these vulnerable people as safe as possible. But I personally think it was incredibly unethical to shut down whole economies just for that.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is stupid on several levels, but I ain’t got time for all that so I’ll just point out that this lady wasn’t younger or healthier, given that she died without an organ transplant, and had she received a transplant she would be one of the vulnerable people on immunosupprressants. So even this stupid ass argument doesn’t apply in this situation.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Someone needing an organ transplant doesn’t sound like “younger” or “healthier” people.
        According to your criteria, regardless of vaccine efficacy: this sounds like someone that should have been vaccinated.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yes the young healthy person who needs an organ transplant. Can’t forget about that demographic.

      • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s ok to be autistic. You don’t have to try and blame it on a vaccine.

      • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup. Literally the worst thing that could have happened to her had she taken the vaccine happened to her because she didn’t take the vaccine. Maybe they’ll put a monument to her on top of the hill that she chose to die on.

      • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was hoping to turn into a magnetic monkey with 5G tracking chips. No such luck.

        The best few minutes of the pandemic for me was watching my 15 year old autistic daughter disassemble and completely humiliate a reality-denying mid-50s angry man at a farmers market. It was glorious.

  • Polar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had a double lung transplant 6 years ago. You have to be EXTREMELY compliant to even get put on the list.

    So many meds and tests and shit stuff you need to follow EXACTLY, every 12 hours, every day, for the rest of your life.

    If you refuse a vaccine you’re never going to care for your new lungs. It’s not easy.

    • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nope. That’s why the courts allow transplant coordinators to require that you be vaccinated. This vaccine was so incredibly safe that it’s ridiculous that she chose to die rather than getting it. I mean, literally the worst thing that could have happened to her because she got the vaccine happened to her because she didn’t get the vaccine.

      • Polar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This vaccine was so incredibly safe that it’s ridiculous that she chose to die rather than getting it.

        Unlike the transplant meds. Pretty large increase for cancer from them.

        Seems weird to refuse a COVID vaccine, but be fine swallowing a ton of meds every 12 hours that increases your risk of cancer significantly.

        Obviously me and many others accept that increased risk, because like you said, the other outcome is just dying straight up.

        In the end I’m glad the organ went to someone else who will respect and appreciate it.

        • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I have a background in chemistry. Early in the pandemic when all the anti-vax nonsense was at its peak I took a look at the ingredients in the three main vaccines in Canada (A-Z, M, and P). For the most part they all included:

          mRNA which we all have in our bodies all the time

          4 salts of which one was table salt

          4 fats of which one was cholesterol

          and sugar.

          That’s it.

          • cadekat@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            While I do agree the vaccines are safe enough, saying “mRNA which we all have in our bodies all the time” is a bit misleading. The number of ways an mRNA strand could mess you up is astronomical.

            • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It is not misleading at all. Every single cell in our bodies contains mRNA at all times.

              What are these ways that mRNA could mess you up of which you speak?

              • cadekat@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                Every single cell in our bodies contains mRNA at all times.

                That’s like saying computer viruses are fine because they’re made of code, which computers are already full of.

                We’re full of mRNA, sure, but we’re full of mRNA that’s supposed to be there.

                What are these ways that mRNA could mess you up of which you speak?

                I’m no biologist, but perhaps mRNA that creates a prion?

                • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Sure, mRNA could be created to create a prion but the mRNA in the vaccine does not. It creates a small fragment of protein similar to a trans-membrane protein on the covid virus.

                  I assumed that you had concrete information to share no just wild anti-vax fear mongering.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fact is, there’s more people in need of transplants and simply not enough viable organs to go around.

      I’m not going to fault the transplant committee for denying someone over a vaccine. Simply, why give this very finite and very precious resource to someone when they’re just going to go get themselves unalived over something as dumb as a 100% preventable disease or something just because they have a brain malfunction that makes them think vaccines are bad. Especially when so many other people are literally dying without the same organs, who are more than happy to follow doctors instructions to ensure they can live a long and prosperous life with the replacement they desperately need.

      It’s all rather silly.

      The thing that probably bothers me the most about organ transplants in general is that if cloning research and stem cell research was allowed to proceed properly, it’s entirely possible that science could find a way to grow you a replacement of your own organs… Apart from genetic problems causing organs to fail, it would almost completely eliminate the entire demand for organs. But no, some idiots don’t want cloning because it upsets their imaginary friend.

      On a related note, go fill out your donor card people. Even if you’re one of those “nobody will want my organs” type of people, do it anyways. The transplant people will figure out if your organs are viable when you no longer need them anymore. Let them figure that shit out for you. Just check the box to be a donor and don’t think about it any further.

      • Polar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        On a related note, go fill out your donor card people. Even if you’re one of those “nobody will want my organs” type of people, do it anyways. The transplant people will figure out if your organs are viable when you no longer need them anymore. Let them figure that shit out for you. Just check the box to be a donor and don’t think about it any further.

        and the stupid rumour about “the doctors will kill me to save 8 others” is bullshit. I am glad my donor signed. His wife said she didn’t want him to, but seeing me live because of his selflessness made her reconsider, and she tells everyone to be a donor.

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That rumor flies in the face of the first rule doctors vow to uphold “do no harm”.

          IDK about you, but killing someone for their organs is pretty damn harmful for the individual “donating” their organs.

          It’s a different story if you’re braindead or hurt to the point of being capable of recovering at all, even with all of the modern science and medicine that is available.

      • Longpork_afficianado@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t just put it on your license either. In many places that isn’t legally binding. Have a conversation with your partner/children/parents who are going to have legal authority over your body while brain dead and tell them you want to be a donor.

  • sndmn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What do you mean I have to stop drinking gin if I want a liver transplant?

    Patient dies because she didn’t follow doctor’s advice.

    • Noodle07@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would they want a liver transplant in the first place if they didn’t drink gin? Doctors not thinking it through

    • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      65
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not remotely comparable. There is no reason to believe she is getting a transplant as a result of covid.

      • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re less likely to get a transplant if you’re more likely to ruin it based on your lifestyle.

        • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          47
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well a hospital in the US didn’t seem to think so. I suppose that’s one of the benefits of a less centralized system.

              • angrymouse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah but throwing an organ away with someone that will die anyway refusing treatment just because they paid or because your system is incapable of transporting organs to better suited donors is not exactly a “benefit”.

      • gianni@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Language will evolve naturally over time. But to claim that hoping your children are intelligent/physically healthy is a form of eugenics is absurd. If QAnon was left-leaning, this is the kind of shit they would say.

          • gianni@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What I said and what you said are not the same thing.

            However, you win the gold medal for mental gymnastics.

            • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I believe that that man was made of straw.

              It’s funny when the trolls come out to play and no one picks up what they’re putting down.

              • gianni@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I could definitely see this person being a troll. What’s wild though is that it seems the linked article was written in earnest.

                • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think it’s really funny that no one is taking the bait. All of the responses have been simple, on point, and non-engaging. That’s how you deal with a troll.

                • Ransom@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I wonder if you’d be able to take a step backward and consider that the linked article was written in earnest because it reflects a valid way of looking at the world that you may never have considered before. People disagreeing with you may not actually be trolling, but presenting their own valid beliefs. Look up disability studies, disability justice, and/or crip theory.

          • Ransom@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I agree that hoping for an intelligent and physically healthy child definitely reflects an ableist worldview. This is basic disability/crip theory.

            For those who are going to argue: wanting an intelligent child is ableist because it implies that people who are intelligent have more worth than people who are not. It’s assigning the value of a person based on a pretty narrow and Western conceptualization of how people think. A person is valuable not because of their intelligence, but because of their existence — all are equally valuable because they’re people, and everyone is equal. The same goes, believe it or not, for physical disabilities, including health. If you disagree, then you think that not all people are equal, which is problematic, as problematic as hoping that your child is straight, or male, or has blonde hair and blue eyes.

            • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s retarded. People can want what they want. The implications and conclusion you jump to sre you-problems, not reflective of society.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you aren’t gonna take steps to protect yourself, you’re not worthy. There’s a long list and many people who will work hard to safeguard such a gift.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Taking this vaccine offends my conscience. I ought to have the choice about what goes into my body, and a lifesaving treatment cannot be denied to me because I chose not to take an experimental treatment for a condition — COVID-19 — which I do not have and which I may never have,” Lewis said in an affidavit.

    I guess she died with a clear conscious. 🙄

    Seriously though, taking an organ from the waitlist and then inevitably getting COVID while immunocompromised is … not very cool… for the next person on the waitlist.

  • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    They don’t give organs to alcoholics who don’t stop drinking either.

    Good luck getting a heart of you refuse to quit eating a hamburger an hour.

    Look, you have to pass a baseline level of taking care of yourself to qualify for an organ, and vaccinations are the bottom, base level first line of defense.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What a dumnass. In her Pyrrhic victory not to be made into a 5g zombie (or whatever nonsense she might have believed) she stood her ground and died like an idiot. She gets no tears from me.

      • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve had…4 different vaccines.

        A-Z sore arm for a day and a splitting headache for two days. ASA resolved it.

        M sore arm for three days and a mild headache. ASA resolved it.

        P x 2 no appreciable sore arm and no headache.

        PBiV - no appreciable sore arm and no headache.

      • Raxiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t forget being banned from eating in restaurants where the owners put up “we don’t call 911” signs and Salad isn’t on the menu.

      • CeeBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is such a paradoxical statement, because if she did get the vaccine willingly, then no one would consider her to be an idiot and thus see no issue with her getting the transplant.

        • ProvableGecko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So what you are saying is if you don’t act like an idiot, nobody would perceive you as an idiot? Yes that is generally how society works.

  • JTode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Transplants are incredibly strict about you not just wanting to live, but doing everything you can in order to live. It is good that the transplant went to someone with a sense of self-preservation. Utter waste on the likes of her.